|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, August 05, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Features
| Previous
| Next
The parable of Phoolan Devi
Phoolan Devi died as she lived, dramatically. Her death
highlights some basic issues: When society and the law fail the
people, often the victim can turn into a victimiser. SWAMI
AGNIVESH and Rev. VALSON THAMPU write on the need to address the
social reality that many Indians face, if we are to realise our
full potential as a nation.
IT is anybody's guess if Phoolan Devi, the bandit queen turned
politician who succumbed to an assassin's bullets the other day
at the prime of her life, would have lived longer if she had
remained in the Chambal valley rather than venture into the
capital city of the nation. She died as she had lived most of her
life, dramatically. Through a combination of significant and
ironic circumstances, the assassination of a reformed and
rehabilitated "ex-enemy of the society" has made headlines in the
media: the very media that turned her into a familiar stereotype.
Stereotypes, as a rule, are a flight from the truth. What was the
truth about Phoolan Devi?
Her parents called her a "flower." That was what her name -
Phoolan - meant. How did she, then, turn out to be a thorn in the
flesh of so many? This question takes us to the sociology of
crime, especially in the Indian context. The story of Phoolan is
a parable on our pathology; a case study on how our society spews
up the poison that endangers its own life.
As a young girl, Phoolan gave no evidence of any special
proclivity to crime. Of course, she was more spirited and
undaunted by the power and pretensions of others than was usual
for girls of her age and station. That was, in part, an innate
personality trait as well as the product of an early exposure to
human callousness and hard-heartedness. Circumstances of life
subjected her to systematic harassment and unspeakable emotional
hurt. It hardened her resolve to fight back and to exact a tooth-
for-a-tooth. Or, more accurately, a jaw-for-a-tooth, as Mr. Arun
Shourie said in a totally different context.
Injustice and exploitation awaited young Phoolan in every segment
of family and social life. Her parents were cheated out of their
property by an unscrupulous and rich relation who also disrupted
and aborted the marriage of her sister Rukmani. Phoolan herself
was forced into a marriage at the tender age of 11 to a man older
than her by two decades. Soon enough, he abandoned her when she
began to develop signs of ill health: a twist to which poor women
in rural India are not strangers. Later, she was witness to her
parents being brutally attacked and humiliated by her uncle with
the help of hired hoodlums. Subsequently, she herself was
attacked, abused and humiliated. It is a measure of the misery
and helplessness that Phoolan and her family endured then, that
her mother advised her to end her life by drowning herself in the
river nearby.
Being informed of her uncle's plan to have her abducted by
bandits, Phoolan sought protection from the police only to be
ridiculed and rebuffed by the keepers of the law. "Abducted? So
what? They will keep you for a few months, get tired of you and
abandon you." Such were the words of comfort that greeted her.
Eventually, she was abducted as she had feared and was
transplanted much against her wish to a world of crime and
violence. With that began one of the most dramatic and romantic
stories of crime and vendetta in recent history. The story of
Phoolan is, thus, a cocktail of covetousness, callousness and
organised cruelty, potent enough to turn every victim into a
potential victimiser. And if, in spite of this, Phoolans are few
and far between, the reason for this is not that this terrible
mix is a rare phenomenon in our society. It is that the spirit of
recklessness, injustice and oppression rarely finds expression,
especially among women who have been socially conditioned to put
up meekly with inhuman conditions of life which are even invested
with religious sanctions.
Phoolan was no rare monster or genius of crime. If her long-time
personal assistant, Francis, is to be believed, she was an
exceptionally kind-hearted and generous person who responded
compassionately to human suffering for as long as he had known
her. Apparently, it was primarily her eagerness to help the
people, especially the poor and the underprivileged, that made
her venture into politics. This is what fills the tragedy of
Phoolan with deep pathos. That circumstances of life and social
conditions can be so harsh and heartless and they craft a monster
of inequity out of an ordinary village girl is indeed a scary
prospect.
The story of Phoolan is a window on the predicament of many in
our society, especially in rural India. Millions live smarting in
conditions of gross injustice. They do not have the means to
procure justice for themselves. All too often the keepers of the
law align themselves with the forces of oppression and injustice.
Constitutional provisions remain pipe dreams as far as the poor
and the marginalised are concerned. Litigation is not a viable
option for the overwhelming majority of our people. We pay lip
service to the creed that dispensing justice is one of the most
sacred duties of the State and that the expectation of justice is
a basic ingredient in the loyalty of the citizen to the State.
The fact remains, nonetheless, that India today bristles with
alienation of various kinds. It is high time that this social
reality is addressed with the seriousness that it really
deserves. It is comic to recommend patriotism to the people and
routinely betray the corresponding obligation to meet their
legitimate aspirations from the State. No society that
accommodates rampant injustice has ever proved healthy or viable
in history. And there is no basis to assume that India can be an
exception to this universal rule.
Ironically, Phoolan's ascent to political visibility, not less
than her submergence in crime, advertises the sickness of our
public life. Her only qualification, for aught we know, for a
career in politics was her folkloric track-record in crime. The
very fact that this was seen at once as a political goldmine
affords an insight into the mass psychology that prevails in this
domain at the present time. In a society of injustice that breeds
a sense of powerlessness in the masses, the instance of "one
among us" having succeeded in braving the juggernaut of the
establishment has unfailing popular appeal. In such a context, it
is inevitable that crime becomes a common ingredient in political
leadership. That being the case, it should not surprise us that
our political culture is being increasingly criminalised. By
available statistics, about 35 per cent of our lawmakers have
criminal record of some kind or the other. While people
disapprove of crime, they tend to develop deep and sub-rational
appreciation for successful criminals, especially those who
create the impression of "taking on the unjust system."
So there is good sense in Phoolan's assassination hogging the
headlines right across the country. This is not merely because
her journey from Chambal to the chamber of national legislature
is a rare success story, which it is. It is also because her life
and death capture the tragedy of thousands, if not millions,
whose native genius is crushed and denied true expression. We are
quick to boast of a billion-strong population and are,
occasionally, stung too that this sea of humanity does not yield
many pearls of distinction in the field of athletics, games and
other frontiers of human excellence. Tragedies like that of
Phoolan's must make us sit up and wonder how many among this
billion that we boast of have a reasonable chance of realising
their full potential. Almost one in every three children below
the age of 14 is living in conditions of bondage, deprivation and
exploitation. Crass poverty disables millions of parents from
giving the bare minimum facilities and opportunities for growth
and development in this society of intense competition. For the
poor, especially since globalisation, waiting for the "trickle
down effect" is like waiting for a train that is unlikely to
arrive.
"A nation that enables the son born of a farmer as I was some
sixty years ago," wrote President Lyndon Baines Johnson of the
United States in the mid-1960s, "to reach where I have deserves
to be mentioned among the best philosophies of the world." It
will be a pity if, in the plethora of journalistic sentimentality
in the wake of Phoolan's assassination, the basic issues
highlighted by her personal tragedy were to be lost sight of. The
birth of another Phoolan on account of the collapse of justice
and the callousness of administration is a far greater tragedy
than the death of this ex-bandit queen; for not every Phoolan can
make it to the Parliament and the mystique thereof.
Swami Agnivesh is a social activist and national president of the
Bonded Labour Liberation Front.
Rev. Valson Thampu is a distinguished author and peace activist.
He is a faculty member of St. Stephen's College, Delhi, and an
ordained minister of the Church of North India.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Features Previous : A chance to change Next : Bedevilling question in the cadence of English | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|