|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Tuesday, August 07, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Front Page
| Previous
| Next
Sena MP not allowed to clarify remarks against PMO
By Our Special Correspondent
NEW DELHI, AUG. 6. The Shiv Sena MP, Mr. Sanjay Nirupam, - whose
allegations against the Prime Minister's Office in connection
with the Unit Trust of India scandal made headlines last week -
was today not allowed by the Chairman of the Rajya Sabha to make
a statement in the House. This was conveyed to Mr. Nirupam in the
Chairman's chamber.
It is understood that Mr. Nirupam wanted to make a statement on
his allegations against the PMO but under the rules of procedure
he was disallowed. Rule 241, under which Mr. Nirupam sought
permission to make a statement, was not applicable in this
instance, he was told.
Later, a four-member Shiv Sena delegation including two
Ministers, Mr. Manohar Joshi and Mr. Suresh Prabhu, and two MPs,
Mr. Satish Pradhan and Mr. Nirupam, waited outside the Prime
Minister's room in Parliament House to meet him. It was said Mr.
Nirupam had been asked to apologise to the Prime Minister for
dragging the PMO into the UTI scandal, but for whatever reasons
the meeting did not take place. Government sources said the Prime
Minister did not meet them, but Mr. Joshi told reporters: ``We
changed our mind. We did not meet the Prime Minister. We thought
it was best to sort out the matter among ourselves first.''
Even as the war of nerves between the two alliance partners in
Maharashtra, the Sena and BJP, showed no signs of abating, the
signal from the Shiv Sena was that it had not yet made up its
mind on apologising to the Prime Minister, privately or publicly.
Earlier, the Rajya Sabha Chairman did not allow Mr Nirupam to
make a statement as under the rules a Minister can make a suo
motu statement, and a member can do so only if it is by way of a
personal explanation in connection with the mention of his name
in the House during his absence. Rule 241 states: ``A member may,
with the permission of the Chairman, make a personal explanation
although there is no question before the Council, but in this
case no debatable matter may be brought forward, and no debate
shall arise.'' The view was that the Nirupam case could not fall
under this rule.
Senior BJP leaders felt the Shiv Sena should make up its mind
about its alliance with the BJP and its membership of the NDA. It
was noted that the Sena had spoken against the Government's
economic and disinvestment policies, it had criticised the BJP
for not taking a tough pro-Hindutva stance, and now it had made
direct allegations against the PMO. Obviously, that last point
was not tolerable.
It was also made clear that any apology from the Sena must be
made publicly. ``We are not demanding anything, but after they
(the Sena) made all kinds of statements publicly, it is but
natural they should say whatever more they want to say also
publicly,'' a BJP leader said.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Front Page Previous : 25 die in T.N. asylum fire Next : 'China supplied missile parts to Pak.' | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|