|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, August 19, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
International
| Previous
| Next
Sinn Fein rejects police reform plan
By Hasan Suroor
LONDON, AUG 18. A British-Irish plan to replace Northern
Ireland's controversial Royal Ulster Constabulary (RUC) with a
communally more diverse and democratic police force - a long-
standing demand of the province's Catholic community - has been
summarily rejected by Sinn Fein which today insisted on more
radical police reforms.
This was seen as yet another setback to the efforts to revive the
peace process bogged down in a dispute over policing and
decommissioning. The plan was intended to break the deadlock by
trading police reforms for an agreement on decommissioning by
IRA. With Sinn Fein, however, refusing to bite it, observers saw
little prospect of an IRA initiative on decommissioning and said
the political crisis was likely to deepen as Unionists remained
determined not to go ahead with the Good Friday Agreement in the
absence of visible progress on decommissioning.
The Northern Ireland Secretary, Dr. John Reid was clearly
dismayed and in his first public show of irritation he said: ``We
can change the structure. But we cannot change hearts and minds
where there is no openness and no willingness to change.'' He
said the plan offered a new beginning for the two communities to
come together, and sought cross-community support for it. He said
the reforms represented the ``spirit and substance'' of the
Patten Commission's recommendations but Sinn Fein maintained that
they fell far short of what Sir Chris Patten, the former Hong
Kong Governor, had recommended in his report.
``Is this the British Government's delivery of their commitment
to deliver Patten and quite clearly the answer is no...and we
will not be recommending support within our constituency to the
policing plan as it stands,'' the Sinn Fein Chairman, Mr. Mitchel
McLaughlin said. Dr. Reid, on the other hand, claimed that there
was a ``lot of nonsense'' being talked about the Patten report
and, in fact, in some respects, the plan was an improvement. He
still hoped that Sinn Fein would review its position and set
August 21 as the deadline for parties to respond to the plan. He
was concerned that Catholics who wanted to join the new police
force should not be stopped.
The reaction from other parties, including Sinn Fein's moderate
nationalist rival, the Social Democratic and Liberal Party
(SDLP), was more encouraging. Mr. David Trimble's Ulster Unionist
Party (UUP) also indicated its backing for the plan which is
aimed at removing RUC's pro-Protestant tilt by recruiting more
Catholics to the proposed new force to be called the Police
Service for Northern Ireland. There would be 50 per cent
Catholics and 50 per cent Protestants on it and the force would
have its own symbols - flag, badge, etc - in a move intended to
assure the Catholic community that the ``hated'' RUC is really
and truly a thing of the past.
Commentators believed that Dr. Reid might go ahead with the plan
with the UUP and SDLP backing (though officially they have yet to
say yes), hoping that a positive cross-community response might
force Sinn Fein to think again.
On the other hand, it could further harden its stand on
decommissioning and prolong the political crisis which erupted in
July when Mr. Trimble resigned as head of the power-sharing
Government insisting that the IRA must start giving up its
weapons as envisaged in the Good Friday Agreement.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : International Previous : Trouble likely at World Bank, IMF meet Next : Caretaker Govt.'s action sparks row | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|