|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, September 02, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
National
| Previous
| Next
New twist to CBI chief's appointment
By Vinay Kumar
NEW DELHI, SEPT. 1. The process of appointment of a regular
director of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) is poised
to take a few twists and turns with the country's two top law
officers expressing divergent views on the Supreme Court's
observations on the Andhra Pradesh police chief, Mr. H.J. Dora, a
front-runner for the job.
Mr. Dora was among the three panelists named by the selection
committee in April this year for appointment as CBI director. The
views of the Attorney-General, Mr. Soli Sorabjee, and the
Solicitor-General, Mr. Harish N. Salve, are sure to cast their
shadow as the committee headed by the Central Vigilance
Commissioner, Mr. N. Vittal, undertakes a fresh exercise to name
a new panel.
The selection committee, which also consists of the Home
Secretary and Secretary (Personnel), has reportedly been asked by
the Prime Minister, Mr. A.B. Vajpayee, to come up with a fresh
set of three names for consideration by the Appointments
Committee of the Cabinet (ACC).
As the earlier panel of Mr. Vittal ran into controversy, the
Government named Mr. P.C. Sharma, special director, as acting CBI
director. Mr. Sharma took over as acting director upon the
retirement of Mr. R.K. Raghavan on April 30.
At the heart of the controversy regarding Mr. Vittal's panel were
the observations made by the Supreme Court in April which noted
that Mr. Dora, who passed the TADA proceedings in cases dating
back to 1994-95 in Hyderabad as police commissioner, had
exercised his power ``in a very casual manner.''
The Special Leave Petition (SLP) reached hearing in the apex
court on July 17 and was dismissed as withdrawn as it was not
pressed by the Andhra Pradesh Government.
Mr. Sorabjee, said Mr. Dora did not appear personally or through
his counsel in response to the notice issued by the Supreme
Court. ``It is also noteworthy that there was no application
before the Supreme Court to delete or expunge its prima facie
observations on Mr. Dora having exercised his powers ``in a very
casual manner.''
In his opinion to the Government, the discharge of notice and
withdrawal of the SLP by Andhra Pradesh ``do not result in
setting aside or obliterating the prima facie observations of the
Supreme Court in its previous order.'' Even upon withdrawal of
the SLP, the adverse finding against Mr. Dora recorded by the
Sessions Judge in his May 21, 1996, order stood, he said.
The Supreme Court's observations on Mr. Dora in its April 17
order, though prima facie, remain intact and ``cannot be ignored
and should be given due weight and consideration in the matter of
selection of the CBI director,'' he added.
A diametrically-opposite view has been expressed by the
Solicitor-General, Mr. Harish N. Salve, whose opinion was sought
by the Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister, Mr. N. Chandrababu Naidu.
Mr. Salve said the observation of the Designated Court that Mr.
Dora had ``mechanically accorded sanction to prosecute the
accused'' under the TADA provisions as well as the Arms Act was
more criticism of the order on legal grounds rather than a
stricture on the person who passed the order.
Mr. Salve said Mr. Dora's affidavit before the apex court had
pointed out that he had more than enough material on which he
could have granted the sanction for prosecution of the accused
persons under TADA. Since the notice to Mr. Dora stood
discharged, ``the observation of the Designated Court cannot be
treated as a personal stricture, much less an adverse comment on
the functioning of Mr. Dora.''
In his opinion, the Supreme Court had discharged the notice which
it had issued to Mr. Dora and there was no proceeding as such in
which he was involved. ``It was a suo motu notice issued by the
court to him. Once this notice is discharged, nothing survives in
the matter as far as he is concerned. Once the notice is
discharged, the issuance of the notice is not a matter which can
be held against him in any manner,'' Mr. Salve said.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : National Previous : Deadline for 'burqa' extended Next : FM 2 channel on air | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|