|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, September 02, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Features
| Previous
| Next
Tragic love
DAVID DAVIDAR
LAST week, a magazine asked me to pick the top 25 novels of our
time. Around 20 picked themselves, of which one was The Great
Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald. The novel was published three-
quarters of a century ago, but when I reread it last week (as
part of my stated intention to re-acquaint myself with the
greatest books of our age) it had not lost its edginess or
ability to grip the imagination.
The storyline is simple enough. Poor Boy loves Rich Girl
obsessively. Boy Goes Off To War, Comes Back a Man. To his great
Disappointment Rich Girl Has Married Rich Boy. Poor Boy Makes His
Own Fortune. Romances Many Women But Does Not Forget His True
Love. The Star-Crossed Lovers Meet, Find A Brief Moment of
Happiness. But the Reader Without A Doubt, That Things Won't Work
Out. Sure enough, tragedy follows and the three-hanky movie is
bound to hit a screen near you a year later. So what makes The
Great Gatsby different from a garden variety Ekta Kapoor soap?
The writing, first and foremost. I'd forgotten how brilliant
Scott Fitzgerald could be when he got motoring and before I get
any further with the review, I will quote a sample of the sort of
writing that only the very best writers are capable of. Here's an
exterior scene, the description of a living room, done nearly a
century ago, but which ninety-nine per cent of today's novelists
would be hard pressed to match: "We walked through a high hallway
into a bright rosy-coloured space, fragilely bound into the house
by French windows at either end. The windows were ajar and
gleaming white against the fresh grass outside that seemed to
grow a little way into the house. A breeze blew through the room,
blew curtains in at one end and out the other like pale flags,
twisting them up toward the frosted wedding-cake of the ceiling,
and then rippled over the wine-coloured rug, making a shadow on
it as wind does on the sea."
However, that is the least of Scott Fitzgerald's accomplishments.
His genius lies in investing his characters with depth and range.
It is this that separates them from the two-dimensional
stereotypes that flit across our TV screens and the pages of
commercial blockbusters. Jay Gatsby, the spurned lover, Daisy
Buchanan, his inamorata, Tom Buchanan, her cloddish husband,
Jordan Baker, Daisy's cool, unflappable friend, even Nick
Carraway, the narrator are drawn with such skill that their
actions and their tragedies matter to us.
Take, for example, this scene involving one of the relatively,
minor characters, the narrator: "Her grey, sun-strained eyes
stared ahead, but she had deliberately shifted our relations, and
for a moment I thought I loved her. But I am slow-thinking and
full of interior rules that act as brakes on my desires, and I
knew that first I had to get myself definitely out of that tangle
back home. I had been writing letters once a week and signing
them: 'Love, Nick', and all I could think of was how, when that
certain girl played tennis, a faint moustache of perspiration
appeared on her upper lip. Nevertheless there was a vague
understanding that had to be tactfully broken off before I was
free.
"Every one suspects himself of at least one of the cardinal
virtues, and this is mine: I am one of the few honest people that
I have ever known".
In the space of two short paras, the reader can imagine the
character. Exactly. That is genius.
The third skill the writer demonstrates to brilliant effort is
his ability to capture perfectly the motivations of human beings.
His rendering of the thoughts that lie behind the actions of his
characters immediately lift them out of the realm of the sort of
pop psychology lesser talents deliver. Indeed, as the New York
Times said of him after his death, at the young age of 44, "He
was better than he knew, for in fact, and in the literary sense
he invented a 'generation'." To that, all I would add is that
today his books have a relevance for us beyond the immediate fact
that they captured America's Jazz Age. They have come to stand as
"splendid excavations of the human condition" and less
portentously are brilliant stories that remain fresh and relevant
almost 100 years after they were written.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Features Previous : Tales travellers tell Next : Scandal dotcom | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|