|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Tuesday, September 04, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Sport
| Previous
| Next
Some stars need sensitivity training
By Harvey Araton
NEW YORK, SEPT. 3. They lead jet-setting lives, continent-hopping
from one exotic location and culture to another. But limousines
await them at the airport, the practice courts all look the same
and the entourage of agents and adulators shield them from
distractions often no more threatening than the most benign local
custom.
Self-absorption and youth often go together like racquet and
hand, but Lleyton Hewitt's unaccountability for his racially
tinged outburst in his third-round U.S. Open match last Friday
against the American James Blake went beyond standard discussions
of maturity and growth.
``If it was said in the heat of battle, that's bad but the lesser
offence,'' Pam Shriver said. ``But if it was without any
understanding of the sensitivity, then the ATP really has to sit
him down.''
Emotional and 20, Hewitt insisted there was ``nothing racial'' to
his remarks to the umpire as he complained about an African-
American linesman's calls during his five-set victory over Blake.
``Look at him, mate, and look at him,'' Hewitt said, referring to
Blake - the son of an African-American father and a Caucasian
mother - and the linesman. ``You tell me what the similarity
is.'' Apparently embarrassed for their country, the older
Australian regulars, current and former players, were said to be
livid about Hewitt's behavior. On television, John McEnroe called
it unforgivable. Mary Carillo, bless her, said Hewitt's postmatch
news conference had ``taken a page right out of Gary Condit's
playbook'' and suggested that Hewitt ``own up, shut up, then grow
up.''
And while these condemnations were all immediate and necessary,
they did not obscure the fact that another fierce and marketable
tennis match was blemished by insensitivity and sheer stupidity.
It wasn't the first time this summer that major tennis stars
served up delicious tennis that ultimately had a sour aftertaste.
The two best matches at Wimbledon, in fact, featured intemperate
follow-up remarks, not from the mouths of babes but from those
who had hit the big Three-Oh. Eyes rolled after Andre Agassi made
unflattering sexual comments about a lineswoman following his
five-set defeat to Patrick Rafter. Heads shook when Goran
Ivanisevic celebrated his long-elusive Wimbledon title with a
homophobic-sounding remark directed at a linesman whose call had
cost him a key point.
Here at the Open, Agassi explained away his Wimbledon
demonstration by saying that such competition can summon anyone's
worst demons. Ivanisevic insisted that his foul expression
consisted of words without reference or meaning.
And in the seemingly unending women's tour food fight, Martina
Hingis said her occasional misadventures into the realm of
political incorrectness with regard to the Williams sisters were
partly attributable to her unfamiliarity with American custom and
law.
It would be unreasonable to expect a young European woman or an
Australian like Hewitt to understand the gravity and complexity
of America's racial history. Yet as Hewitt said, he is from a
``multicultured'' country that has its own racial conflict and,
let's be honest, there are a handful of hot-button social issues
that cross all borders.
While Tiger Woods in golf and the Williams sisters in tennis have
in recent years elevated the American discussion of the rise of
people of colour in country-club sports, tennis for years has had
players of colour from India, the Middle East and elsewhere. It
will never be the sport of the masses, but tennis is global and
becoming more and more diverse.
``You look at Russia and a lot of the Eastern Bloc countries,
people that come out and travel and have a chance to play tennis
internationally,'' Monica Seles said. ``Then you look at the
Williams sisters, who have brought tennis to a different
audience. I think the sport has opened up to people who probably
wouldn't have gotten a chance beforehand.''
Yet tennis is also a sport that demands a single- minded
lifestyle long before adolescence. Most players don't get the
benefit of some socialisation on a university campus like our
scholar athletes in basketball and football. They grow up and
then live in what Shriver called ``the bubble.''
There are exceptions, of course. There are throwbacks. For all
his character flaws, Agassi has a deep philanthropic side. Rafter
is an Aussie throwback who took a recent challenge by the same
James Blake as an opportunity to encourage, not disparage, him.
``He was just a really good fella,'' Rafter said of his
conversations with Blake. ``Take people as you find them.''
It would be good advice for players, men and women, and a good
start for tennis to begin some serious sensitivity training on
its myopic stars.
Hewitt's girlfriend, the Belgian star Kim Clijsters, said, ``He
wasn't upset at all because he didn't mean it badly.'' Too many
people surround these players and tell them what they want to
hear. It's up to tennis to make them understand how they come
across.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Sport Previous : Tatas to sponsor Indian Open Next : Ferrero, Ivanisevic and Seles sink | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|