News Update Service
Tuesday, August 7, 2007 : 1625 Hrs


Sections
  • Top Stories
  • National
  • International
  • Regional
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Sci. & Tech.
  • Entertainment
  • Agri. & Commodities

  • Index

  • Photo Gallery

    The Hindu
    Print Edition

  • Front Page
  • National
  • Tamil Nadu
  • Andhra Pradesh
  • Karnataka
  • Kerala
  • Delhi
  • Other States
  • International
  • Opinion
  • Business
  • Sport
  • Miscellaneous
  • Index

  • Life
  • Magazine
  • Literary Review
  • Metro Plus
  • Business
  • Education Plus
  • Open Page
  • Book Review
  • SciTech
  • Entertainment
  • Young World
  • Property Plus
  • Quest
  • Folio

  • National
    Arguments in Salman case complete, decision on Aug. 24

    Jodhpur (Rajasthan), Aug. 7 (PTI): A court here today said it would rule on actor Salman Khan's appeal against a five-year prison term given to him in a poaching case on August 24.

    Following the completion of arguments on the appeal filed by Salman, District and Sessions Judge Kamal Raj Singhvi said the court would pronounce its verdict on August 24.

    Public Prosecutor Pokar Ram Vishnoi strongly protested Salman's counsel's arguments regarding improper use of various sections of the Wildlife Protection Act against the actor.

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Brijendra Kumar Jain had on April 10 last year convicted Salman for poaching an endangered blackbuck and given him a five-year prison term. The court also fined him Rs 25,000. Salman has filed the appeal against the verdict.

    After failing to appear in Judge Singhvi's court on several occasions, the star went there yesterday.

    Replying the objections raised by the advocates of Salman that prosecution did not complied the proceedings like complaining before the competent authority in such case and filing of FIR directly with the police station, Vishnoi contended that there were several other sections of the IPC against the accused when the FIR was filed and that was the right manner.

    The prosecution told the court that proceeding was completed in the right manner and there was no question of improper proceeding under the Act.

    He contended that the entire case was argued before the lower court and need no interference any more.

    A tense-looking Salman was present in the court for the second consecutive day to hear the two-hour-long arguments by the prosecution.


    National


    Weather

  • Bangalore
  • Chennai
  • Hyderabad
  • Delhi
  • Thiruvananthapuram

    Cities

  • Chennai
  • Delhi
  • Hyderabad
  • Kolkata
  • Mumbai
  • Pune
  • Thiruvananthapuram



  • Sections: Top Stories | National | International | Regional | Business | Sport | Sci. & Tech. | Entertainment | Agri. & Commodities | Delhi | Chennai | Hyderabad | Thiruvananthapuram | Mumbai | Kolkata | Pune | Index
    The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Contacts | Subscription
    Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | Business Line News Update | Sportstar | Frontline | Publications | eBooks | Images | Home

    Copyright © 2007, The Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu